🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which election day went kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.