🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I know multiple businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.